Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present the concentration (c)Yvirial mass (M ) relation of 39 galaxy systems ranging in mass from individual -type galaxies up to the most massive galaxy clusters, (0:06Y20) ; 1014 M. We selected for analysis the most systems possessing the highest quality data currently available in the Chandra and XMM-Newton public data . A power-law model fitted to the X-ray c-M relation requires at high significance (6.6 ) that c decreases with M, which is a general feature of CDM models. The median and scatter of the c-M relation produced by the , concordance CDM model (m 1⁄4 0:3, 8 1⁄4 0:9) agrees with the X-ray data, provided that the sample is comprised the most relaxed, early-forming systems, which is consistent with our selection criteria. When allowing only 8 to vary in the concordance model, the c-M relation requires 0:76 < 8 < 1:07 (99% confidence), assuming a 10% bias in the concentrations for early-forming systems. The tilted, low-8 model suggested by a new WMAP is rejected at 99.99% confidence, but a model with the same tilt and normalization can be reconciled with the -ray data by increasing the dark energy equation of state parameter to w 0:8. When imposing the additional constraint the tight relation between 8 and m from studies of cluster abundances, the X-ray c-M relation excludes (>99% confidence) both open CDM models and flat CDM models with m 1. This result provides novel evidence for flat, low-m universe with dark energy using observations only in the local (zT1) universe. Possible systematic errors the X-ray mass measurements of a magnitude 10% suggested by CDM simulations do not change our conclusions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buote et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: