Why the study?
Some intensive care standards were not achievable by smaller units, prompting recognition that smaller hospitals cannot implement large-hospital structures despite achieving comparable outcomes.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
May inform rural ICU staffing and transfer policies; leaves open optimal care models for resource-limited settings.
Intensive care medicine is a relatively new specialty. In developing standards of care, it became apparent that some aspects were not achievable by smaller units. Within the intensive care community, there has been a gradual acceptance that smaller hospitals cannot necessarily implement structures that are used in large hospitals, and that outcomes can be comparable with larger units despite this. The Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine set up a Smaller and Specialist Units Advisory Group to explore this area, and this article initially explains the background and work of the faculty to support and sustain these units. We then move on to look at critical care in the context of the recent emergence of wider work on remote and rural healthcare. Finally, we explore our future horizons and look in detail at the areas where further developments will transform the care of critically ill patients within the smaller hospitals of the next 20 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher Thorpe (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: