Why the study?
Does a prediction model based on clinical variables accurately predict the 1- to 5-year risk of prostate cancer in men?
Does a prediction model based on clinical variables accurately predict the 1- to 5-year risk of prostate cancer in men?
A clinical prediction model using widely available variables accurately predicts a man's 1- to 5-year risk of developing prostate cancer, which can help individualize screening intervals.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support risk-stratified prostate cancer screening; extends SELECT-PLCO validation to an independent cohort but requires prospective impact trials.
BACKGROUND: A model was built that characterized effects of individual factors on five-year prostate cancer (PCa) risk in the Prostate, Lung, Colon, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) and the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). This model was validated in a third San Antonio Biomarkers of Risk (SABOR) screening cohort. METHODS: A prediction model for 1- to 5-year risk of developing PCa and Gleason > 7 PCa (HG PCa) was built on PLCO and SELECT using the Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for patient baseline characteristics. Random forests and neural networks were compared to Cox proportional hazard survival models, using the trial datasets for model building and the SABOR cohort for model evaluation. The most accurate prediction model is included in an online calculator. RESULTS: The respective rates of PCa were 8.9%, 7.2%, and 11.1% in PLCO (n = 31,495), SELECT (n = 35,507), and SABOR (n = 1790) over median follow-up of 11.7, 8.1 and 9.0 years. The Cox model showed higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA), BMI and age, and African American race to be associated with PCa and HGPCa. Five-year risk predictions from the combined SELECT and PLCO model effectively discriminated risk in the SABOR cohort with C-index 0.76 (95% CI [0.72, 0.79]) for PCa, and 0.74 (95% CI [0.65,0.83]) for HGPCa. CONCLUSIONS: A 1- to 5-year PCa risk prediction model developed from PLCO and SELECT was validated with SABOR and implemented online. This model can individualize and inform shared screening decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gelfond et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: