Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Several clinical trials have recently proven the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy for treating ischemic stroke, within a six-hour window for therapy. To move beyond treatment windows and toward personalized risk assessment, it is essential to accurately identify the extent of tissue-at-risk ("penumbra"). We introduce a fully automated method to estimate the penumbra volume using multimodal MRI (diffusion-weighted imaging, a T2w- and T1w contrast-enhanced sequence, and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI). The method estimates tissue-at-risk by predicting tissue damage in the case of both persistent occlusion and of complete recanalization. When applied to 19 test cases with a thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grading of 1-2a, mean overestimation of final lesion volume was 30 ml, compared with 121 ml for manually corrected thresholding. Predicted tissue-at-risk volume was positively correlated with final lesion volume ( p < 0.05). We conclude that prediction of tissue damage in the event of either persistent occlusion or immediate and complete recanalization, from spatial features derived from MRI, provides a substantial improvement beyond predefined thresholds. It may serve as an alternative method for identifying tissue-at-risk that may aid in treatment selection in ischemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McKinley et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: