Why the study?
Evidence-based lifestyle interventions tailored to young adults with serious mental illness are needed to reduce their cardiometabolic risk.
Does a group lifestyle intervention enhanced with mHealth improve weight, cardiorespiratory fitness, and cardiovascular risk compared to one-on-one mHealth coaching in overweight or obese young adults with serious mental illness?
Does a group lifestyle intervention enhanced with mHealth improve weight, cardiorespiratory fitness, and cardiovascular risk compared to one-on-one mHealth coaching in overweight or obese young adults with serious mental illness?
A group lifestyle intervention was not superior to low-intensity one-on-one mHealth coaching for cardiometabolic risk reduction in young adults with serious mental illness, though both approaches yielded significant improvements.
Low-intensity mHealth coaching matches group intervention for cardiometabolic gains in young adults with serious mental illness; extends support for scalable mHealth approaches.
OBJECTIVE: Evidence-based lifestyle interventions tailored to young adults with serious mental illness are needed to reduce their cardiometabolic risk. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a group lifestyle intervention ("PeerFIT") enhanced with mobile health (mHealth) compared with one-on-one mHealth coaching (basic education supported by activity tracking [BEAT]) for young adults with serious mental illness who were overweight or obese. METHODS: , who were randomly assigned to PeerFIT or BEAT. Research staff collected data at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Main outcomes were clinically significant changes from baseline in weight (≥5% weight loss), cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF; increase of >50 m on the 6-minute walk test), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction (clinically significant weight loss or CRF improvement). RESULTS: Participants were 150 young adults with a mean ± SD body mass index of 37.1±7.4. Intent-to-treat analyses revealed no significant between-group difference for weight-loss, CRF, or CVD outcomes at 6 and 12 months. Participants in both conditions achieved clinically significant CVD risk reduction, weight loss, and CRF from baseline to 6 and 12 months, and all these improvements were statistically significant (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The PeerFIT group lifestyle intervention was not superior to one-on-one mHealth coaching in achieving clinically significant changes in weight, CRF, and CVD risk reduction. Although both interventions improved outcomes, low-intensity mHealth coaching may be a more scalable approach for addressing modifiable cardiometabolic risk factors among young adults with serious mental illness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aschbrenner et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: