Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
How did the Internet affect learning in higher education? What methodological and theoretical issues characterized research on Internet-Supported Learning (ISL)? What implications existed for future research? A constant comparative, qualitative analysis of 29 studies indicated grade achievement was the prime measure of effectiveness in ISL environments although some additionally assessed student motivation, participation and satisfaction. Some 45% of the studies reported positive results, whereas 55% reported no significant differences. Most studies used quantitative design methodologies. Generally, ISL was found to be more (a) student, group, and/or project-focused and (b) feedback intensive than its classroom counterpart. Other results and implications are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bekele et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: