Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To understand how the stimulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) by different growth factors can activate different subsets of downstream responses, growth-factor regulation of PI 3-kinase activity at different intracellular locations was investigated in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Insulin caused a large stimulation of glucose transport and stimulated recruitment of transferrin receptors to the plasma membrane (PM) in these cells, whereas platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-bb was virtually without effect on these responses. Subcellular fractionation studies after stimulation with PDGF-bb or insulin revealed a differential effect of these growth factors on subcellular localization of PI 3-kinase activity. PDGF was more effective than insulin in stimulating PI 3-kinase activity and recruiting the p85 alpha PI 3-kinase adaptor subunit in the fraction containing the PM. However, in the microsomal fraction insulin significantly increased PI 3-kinase activity and p85 alpha levels, whereas PDGF was almost without effect. In the microsomal membrane fraction the insulin-stimulated recruitment of p85 alpha closely matched the increase PI 3-kinase activity, indicating that insulin stimulation of PI 3-kinase in this fraction is largely due to recruitment of PI 3-kinase enzyme rather than alterations in specific activity. Insulin-stimulated recruitment of p85 alpha to the microsomal membranes was not inhibited by wortmannin, indicating that PI 3-kinase activity was not required for this process. A further level of compartment-specific regulation of PI 3-kinase in response to PDGF was revealed by the finding that tyrosine phosphorylation of the p85 alpha adaptor was restricted to the PM-containing fraction. Insulin had no effect on p85 tyrosine phosphorylation in either fraction. In summary, these results suggest a basis by which insulin and PDGF could both use PI 3-kinase signalling cascades but achieve different signalling outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
NAVÉ et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: