We study competitive procurement administered by a corrupt agent who is willing to manipulate his evaluation of contract proposals in exchange for bribes. With complete information and no corruption, the efficient firm will win the contract for sure. If the agent is corrupt and has large manipulation power, however, bribery makes it costly for the efficient firm to secure a sure win, so in equilibrium the efficient firm loses the contract with positive probability. The optimal scoring rule for the buyer deemphasizes quality relative to price and does not fully handicap, and may even favor, the efficient firm. “Corruption wins not more than honesty.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burguet et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: