Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study consumer liquidity in a general equilibrium model where the friction is the nonpledgeability of future income. Liquidity helps to overcome the absence of a double coincidence of wants. Consumers over-hoard liquidity and the resulting competitive equilibrium is constrained inefficient. Fiscal policy following a large negative shock can increase ex-ante welfare. If the government cannot commit, the ex-post optimal fiscal policy will be too small from an ex-ante perspective. The model throws light on the holding of foreign reserves in international markets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hart et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: