Why the study?
Standard treatment for soft tissue sarcoma has not substantially changed over decades, but recent advances in imaging, genetic analysis, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have contributed to improved management.
This review provides an updated overview of the diagnosis, multidisciplinary treatment, and future perspectives for managing soft tissue sarcomas.
Provides updated guidance on soft tissue sarcoma management; leaves open validation of novel diagnostics and therapies in prospective studies.
Standard treatment for soft tissue sarcoma, based on complete surgical resection with or without adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has not substantially changed during the last several decades. Nevertheless, recent advances have contributed to considerable improvement in the management of these patients; for example, new magnetic resonance imaging sequences such as diffusionweighted imaging and magnetic resonance imaging radiomics can better assess tumor extension and even estimate its grade. Detection of circulating genetic material (liquid biopsy) and next-generation sequencing are powerful techniques for genetic analysis, which will increase our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms and may reveal potential therapeutic targets. The role of chemotherapy in non-metastatic disease is still controversial, and there is a need to identify patients who really benefit from this treatment. Novel chemotherapeutic regimens have entered clinical praxis and can change the outcome of patients with metastatic disease. Advances in radiotherapy have helped decrease local adverse effects and sustain good local control of the disease. The following report provides an updated view of the diagnosis, treatment, and future perspectives on the management of patients with soft tissue sarcomas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gómez-Álvarez et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: