Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: In the 1950s, Sweden initiated prophylaxis as a lifelong treatment for haemophilia. It was the first country to do so. OBJECTIVES: To describe and evaluate dosing and outcome of prophylactic treatment in a large cohort of adult people with severe haemophilia who have been using prophylaxis most of their lives. METHODS: Eighty-one patients born between 1932 and1992 were divided into two groups (Group A started prophylaxis at the age of ≤ 3 yr; Group B at three or more years of age) and evaluated retrospectively. Outcome was evaluated using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) and SF-36, a measure of quality of life. RESULTS: The median number of joint bleeds per year was 0 in both study groups; however, the annual number of joint bleeds during the final 3 yr of observation was higher in group B than in group A (P < 0.006). Twenty-five of 30 patients in group A and 27/51 patients in group B had no joint bleeds in that period. Group A had significantly better joint outcomes than group B. Patients in group A experienced better physical and social health than those in group B. CONCLUSIONS: This follow-up has provided for the first time more extensive and detailed information regarding the practice of prophylactic treatment in a large cohort of adults with severe haemophilia. The present study confirms that early start of prophylaxis continuing throughout the lifespan has been successful in virtually eliminating joint bleeds, preserving a close to normal joint status, and keeping patients healthy and able to live normal lives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khawaji et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: