Why the study?
Enterovirus A species cause hand, foot and mouth disease in young children, and understanding the mutual codon usage pattern of the virus and its host has fundamental and applied value.
Unconventional EV-A clades exhibit unique codon usage patterns shaped by natural selection, and optimizing these codons significantly enhances viral protein expression in human cells.
May guide antigen production for unconventional EV-A vaccines; leaves open in vivo fitness, immunogenicity, and clinical translation.
Enterovirus A ( EV-A ) species cause hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), threatening the health of young children. Understanding the mutual codon usage pattern of the virus and its host(s) has fundamental and applied values. Here, through examining multiple codon usage parameters, we found that the codon usage bias among EV-A strains varies and is clade-specific. EVA76, EVA89, EVA90, EVA91 and EVA92, the unconventional clade of EV-A strains, show unique codon usage pattern relative to the two conventional clades, including EVA71, CVA16, CVA6 and CVA10, etc. Analyses of Effective Number of Codon (ENC), Correspondence Analysis (COA) and Parity Rule 2 (PR2), etc. , revealed that the codon usage patterns of EV-A strains are shaped by mutation pressure and natural selection. Based on the neutrality analysis, we determined the dominant role of natural selection in the formation of the codon usage bias of EV-A . In addition, we have determined the codon usage compatibility of potential hosts for EV-A strains using codon adaptation index (CAI), relative codon deoptimization index (RCDI) and similarity index (SiD) analyses, and found that EV-A showed host-specific codon adaptation patterns in different clades. Finally, we confirmed that the unique codon usage pattern of the unconventional clade affected protein expression level in human cell lines. In conclusion, we identified novel characteristics of codon usage bias in distinct EV-A clades associated with their host range, transmission and pathogenicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: