Why the study?
The study aimed to systematically evaluate and perform a meta-analysis on the effects of LBBAP on right ventricular function.
Does left bundle branch area pacing improve right ventricular function compared to intrinsic conduction or right ventricular pacing?
Does left bundle branch area pacing improve right ventricular function compared to intrinsic conduction or right ventricular pacing?
LBBAP significantly improves right ventricular systolic function and biventricular synchronization compared to intrinsic conduction and right ventricular pacing, though it carries a risk of tricuspid regurgitation worsening over time.
LBBAP may preserve RV function better than RVP; leaves open confirmation in randomized outcome trials.
Objective This study aims to systematically evaluate and perform a meta-analysis on the effects of LBBAP on right ventricular (RV) function by collecting data on Right Ventricular Fractional Area Change (RV-FAC), Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE), Interventricular Mechanical Delay (IVMD), and the incidence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) worsening in Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) patients. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted for studies published from the establishment of the respective databases until October 2024 in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. After screening and data extraction, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for the quality assessment of the included cohort studies, and meta-analysis was performed using R software. The effect size was estimated using either a random-effect model or a fixed-effect model, with odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD). Results A total of 14 studies were included, analyzing 1,555 LBBAP patients. The meta-analysis revealed that compared with intrinsic conduction, LBBAP implantation significantly improved RV-FAC (MD = 1.93; 95% CI: 0.64–3.23, P = 0.0034) and TAPSE (MD = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.07–2.06, P < 0.0001). Compared to the RVP group, LBBAP implantation significantly shortened IVMD (MD = −21.27; 95% CI: −31.33 to −11.22, P < 0.0001). For patients with RV dysfunction or right bundle branch block (RBBB), LBBAP implantation also significantly reduced IVMD (MD = −31.31; 95% CI: −37.10 to −25.52, P < 0.0001). The incidence of TR worsening within one year after LBBAP was approximately 8%, increasing to 23% beyond one year. Conclusion This meta-analysis demonstrates the superiority of LBBAP over intrinsic conduction in improving RV systolic function. Compared to RVP, LBBAP significantly enhances biventricular synchronization. Furthermore, LBBAP also improves ventricular synchronization in patients with RV dysfunction or RBBB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: