Why the study?
Alirocumab improves outcomes after recent acute coronary syndrome, but treatment acutely at the time of myocardial infarction remained untested.
Does one dose of alirocumab 150 mg subcutaneously reduce LDL-C in patients with type 1 NSTEMI and LDL-C >70 mg/dL despite high intensity statin therapy?
Does one dose of alirocumab 150 mg subcutaneously reduce LDL-C in patients with type 1 NSTEMI and LDL-C >70 mg/dL despite high intensity statin therapy?
A single dose of alirocumab 150 mg administered acutely at the time of NSTEMI significantly reduces LDL-C levels at 14 days without serious adverse events.
Supports single-dose alirocumab for rapid LDL-C reduction in NSTEMI; extends PCSK9i evidence to the acute post-MI phase.
Alirocumab improves outcomes in patients with a history of recent acute coronary syndrome, but treatment acutely at the time of myocardial infarction is untested. We present the results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded pilot study of alirocumab treatment at the time of non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI). Twenty patients with type 1 NSTEMI and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >70 mg/dL despite high intensity statin therapy were randomized 1:1 to one dose of alirocumab 150 mg subcutaneously or placebo within 24 hours of presentation. LDL-C and inflammatory biomarkers-including C-reactive protein-were obtained at baseline, 72 hours, and 14 days. Median (interquartile range) and number (%) were: age 59 (49, 65) years, 7 (35%) men, 16 (80%) black; baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C from baseline to 14 days by 64 mg/dL (-96, -47) compared with placebo [+1 mg/dL (-25, +16)] (primary endpoint). There were no significant between-group differences in C-reactive protein changes at any time point (all P > 0.2) or serious adverse events attributable to the study treatment. In conclusion, alirocumab administration at the time of NSTEMI significantly reduced LDL-C levels at 14 days, was safe, and had neutral effects on inflammatory biomarkers. Further studies are warranted to explore the effects on clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trankle et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: