Key result
Alirocumab cuts post-ACS coronary revascularization ~12% vs placebo, with greatest benefit in elevated baseline Lp(a).
Why the study?
It was unknown whether the risk of revascularization after ACS was modified by lipoprotein(a) levels and treatment with alirocumab versus placebo.
Does alirocumab reduce the risk of revascularization in patients with recent ACS and elevated atherogenic lipoproteins, and is this effect modified by baseline lipoprotein(a) levels?
RCT (n=18,924)
Does alirocumab reduce the risk of revascularization in patients with recent ACS and elevated atherogenic lipoproteins, and is this effect modified by baseline lipoprotein(a) levels?
Hazard Ratio: 0.88 (95% CI 0.8–0.97)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.8% vs 3.2%
p-value: p=0.01
Alirocumab significantly reduces the risk of revascularization after ACS, with the greatest benefit observed in patients with elevated baseline lipoprotein(a) levels.
Alirocumab was associated with fewer revascularizations post-ACS, greatest with high Lp(a); hypothesis-generating, needs prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Many patients require revascularization after index acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Lipoprotein(a) is thought to play a pathogenic role in atherothrombosis. In ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, alirocumab reduced major adverse cardiovascular events after ACS, with greater reduction among those with higher lipoprotein(a) levels. We explored whether risk of revascularization after ACS was modified by the level of lipoprotein(a) and treatment with alirocumab or placebo. METHODS: In ODYSSEY OUTCOMES alirocumab was compared with placebo in 18,924 patients with ACS and elevated atherogenic lipoprotein levels despite optimized statin treatment. In this post hoc analysis, treatment effects are summarized using competing risks proportional hazard models. RESULTS: A total of 1559 (8.2%) patients had coronary, 204 (1.1%) had limb, and 40 (0.2%) had carotid revascularization. Alirocumab reduced coronary revascularization (2.8 vs 3.2 events per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.80-0.97]; P = 0.01) and any revascularization (3.2 vs 3.7 events per 100 patient-years; HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.78-0.94]; P = 0.001). Baseline lipoprotein(a) quartile was directly associated with risk of coronary or any revascularization in the placebo arm and inversely related to treatment HRs (all P for trend < 0.01). Alirocumab produced the greatest reduction of coronary revascularization in patients with baseline lipoprotein(a) in the top quartile (≥ 59.6 mg/dL; HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.57-0.84]), but no apparent reduction in the bottom quartile (HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.82-1.22]). Findings were similar for the effect of alirocumab on any revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Alirocumab reduced revascularization rates after ACS. The risk of revascularization and reduction in that risk with alirocumab were greatest in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) at baseline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szarek et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=18,924). Alirocumab vs. Placebo was evaluated on Coronary revascularization (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.97, p=0.01). Alirocumab reduced coronary revascularization after ACS compared to placebo (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80-0.97; P=0.01), with the greatest benefit seen in patients with elevated baseline lipoprotein(a).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: