Why the study?
It was hypothesized that circulating BNP level changes after stress-induced myocardial ischemia could be used for ED ACS risk stratification.
Does stress-delta BNP predict a composite outcome of ischemia or adverse cardiac events in ED patients with suspected ACS?
Does stress-delta BNP predict a composite outcome of ischemia or adverse cardiac events in ED patients with suspected ACS?
Stress-delta BNP does not provide sufficient diagnostic or predictive value for ACS risk stratification in ED patients, though resting baseline BNP may offer prognostic utility.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Stress-delta BNP lacks predictive value for ACS in ED patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before any clinical role.
BACKGROUND: There are many detectable changes in circulating biomarkers in the setting of myocardial ischemia. We hypothesize that there are associated changes in circulating B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level after stress-induced myocardial ischemia, which can be used for emergency department (ED) acute coronary syndrome (ACS) risk stratification. METHODS: In a prospective study, we enrolled 340 patients over the age of 30 receiving an exercise echocardiography stress test in an ED observational unit for suspected ACS. We collected blood samples at baseline and at 2 and 4 h post-stress test, measuring the relative and absolute changes (stress-delta) in plasma BNP concentrations. In addition, patients were contacted at 90 days and at 1 year posttest for a follow-up. We calculated the diagnostic test characteristics of stress-delta BNP for a composite outcome of ischemic imaging on stress echocardiogram, nonelective percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, subsequent acute myocardial infarction, or cardiac death at 1 year via a logistic regression. We analyzed the 2-h BNP concentrations using an ANOVA model to adjust for the baseline BNP level. RESULTS: Baseline and 2-h post-stress BNP were both higher in the positive outcome group, but the stress-delta BNP was not. Stress-delta BNP had a sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of 53% and 76% at 2 h and 67% and 68% at 4 h. It was noted that patients with the composite outcome had a higher baseline BNP level. CONCLUSIONS: BNP stress-deltas are poor diagnostic means for ACS risk stratification, but resting BNP remains a promising prognostic tool for ED patients with suspected ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Susman et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: