Why the study?
Does the PAI-1 inhibitor IMD-1622 improve cardiac function and reduce inflammation in a rat model of experimental autoimmune myocarditis?
Does the PAI-1 inhibitor IMD-1622 improve cardiac function and reduce inflammation in a rat model of experimental autoimmune myocarditis?
In a rat model of experimental autoimmune myocarditis, treatment with a PAI-1 inhibitor improved left ventricular fractional shortening and reduced myocardial inflammation and fibrosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not inform clinical practice; extends preclinical evidence for PAI-1 inhibition in myocarditis models.
OBJECTIVE: Myocarditis is a serious disease, however no effective treatment exists. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is critical in cell recruitment and inflammation. Although inflammation is an essential pathological feature of acute myocarditis, the effects of PAI-1 inhibition on the development of acute myocarditis have not been well studied. METHODS: To clarify the role of PAI-1, we used a rat experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) model. Lewis rats were immunized on day 0 with porcine cardiac myosin to establish EAM. The rats with induced EAM were treated with the PAI-1 inhibitor (IMD-1622) (n = 8) or not treated (n = 6); hearts were harvested on day 21. Echocardiograms, heart weight to body weight ratios (H:B), histological examinations and in vitro studies were performed. RESULTS: Echocardiograms indicated that the PAI-1 inhibitor improved left ventricular fractional shortening (50 +/- 3%) compared with controls (36 +/- 4%, p < 0.05). The inhibitor significantly reduced H:B ratios compared with controls. Pathologically, areas of myocardial cell infiltration and fibrosis in the inhibitor-treated group were significantly smaller than those in the control group. Immunohistochemistry revealed enhanced expression of adhesion molecules and inflammatory factors in non-treated EAM hearts, the inhibitor suppressed this expression. CONCLUSIONS: The PAI-1 inhibitor suppressed EAM development; thus this inhibitor is promising for treating clinical myocarditis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: