Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article discusses the challenges of ensuring validity and reliability in multi-platform social media research, emphasizing participant-centered approaches.
Validity and reliability are long established as central tenets of ensuring good quality research. However, safeguarding validity and reliability can be challenging within the context of multi-platform social media research, as considerations such as access to data or self-selection place caveats upon the generalizability of any study and are exacerbated when multiple platforms are involved. In this article, examples are drawn from a recent empirical study and others to illustrate how these issues can become amplified within the context of multi-platform social media studies. These include reconsidering the concept of a representative sample across multiple platforms; issues balancing ethical considerations and terms of service in accessing data; and the effect of data repackaging strategies and extent to which similar data from different platforms can be comparable. The article will conclude by arguing that drawing upon qualitative approaches, particularly a complimentary reframing of the unit of analysis with a focus on particular users as case studies, can ameliorate these issues and strengthen the insight of multi-platform social media studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katy Jordan (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: