Key result
Diastolic indices appear more accurate than FFR for functional assessment of myocardial bridges.
Why the study?
MINOCA is frequent and its etiology is heterogeneous.
Are diastolic indices more accurate than fractional flow reserve for the functional assessment of myocardial bridges?
Case Report (n=1)
Are diastolic indices more accurate than fractional flow reserve for the functional assessment of myocardial bridges?
Diastolic indices provide a more accurate physiological assessment of myocardial bridges compared to FFR, which is confounded by systolic pressure overshoot.
Diastolic indices may aid myocardial bridge assessment where FFR is confounded; Level 5 data leaves open prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is frequent, and the etiology is heterogenous. CASE SUMMARY: " pressure waveform. DISCUSSION: In a myocardial bridge, the compression of the coronary artery causes a systolic pressure overshoot and negative pressure gradient resulting in unreliable fractional flow reserve measurements. Physiological assessment with diastolic indices is more accurate for functional assessment of myocardial bridges. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: pressure waveform distal to a severe myocardial bridge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wong et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) (n=1). Physiological assessment with diastolic indices is more accurate than fractional flow reserve for the functional assessment of myocardial bridges.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: