Evaluates tear evaporation rates under varying blinking conditions, suggesting optimal conditions for measurement.
Abstract Purpose To evaluate the reliability and agreement of tear film evaporation measurements under different blinking conditions. Methods Ninety-six healthy volunteers (96 eyes) were recruited. Tear evaporation was measured using the Eye Vapometer under four randomized conditions: no-blinking, natural blinking, controlled blinking (one blink every 3 s), and eyes-closed. Raw evaporation rates were recorded in three consecutive measurements for each condition. Tear evaporation rates (TER) were calculated by subtracting the raw evaporation rate with eyes-closed from the other three conditions. Reliability of raw measurements were assessed, and agreement between TER values was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method. Results Consecutive measurements taken under the no-blinking condition showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.04). The repeatability values for no-blinking, natural blinking, controlled blinking and eyes-closed were 56.12, 44.78, 42.46 and 22.32, respectively. The no-blinking condition provided significantly higher TER values than natural blinking (p < 0.001) and controlled blinking (p = 0.005). Conclusions Blinking affects the reliability of evaporation measurement, with the least reliable condition being no-blinking. TER under the natural blinking condition shows good reliability and best represents physiological function during daily activities; therefore, it appears to be the most appropriate condition for TER evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez-Plaza et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: