Demonstrates regioselective formation of alcohols from epoxides and esters, suggesting efficient catalytic pathways.
The reaction of two α‐diimine ligands, N , N‐ disubstituted 1,4‐diaza‐butadienes ( Dipp DAD and t Bu DAD) with dineosilylmagnesium [Mg(CH 2 SiMe 3 ) 2 ] directed the migration of mononeosilyl group(─CH 2 SiMe 3 ) to one of the two C═N bonds of the diaza ligand, followed by intramolecular hydrogen migration, which resulted in the synthesis of amido‐imino magnesium complexes, [ κ 2 ‐{Dipp─N═C(CH 2 SiMe 3 )─CH 2 NDipp}‐Mg(CH 2 SiMe 3 ){THF}] ( 1 ) and [ κ 2 ‐{ t Bu─N═C(CH 2 SiMe 3 )‐CH 2 N t Bu}Mg(CH 2 SiMe 3 )] 2 ( 2 ), respectively in very good yields. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis elucidated the THF‐solvated monomeric structure of complex 1 , whereas magnesium complex 2 crystallized as a dimeric form containing a Mg 2 N 2 unit as a four‐membered metallacycle. The magnesium neosilyl complexes 1 and 2 efficiently catalyzed the hydroboration of epoxides and esters in the presence of pinacolborane (HBpin), leading to the regioselective formation of alcohol derivatives and boronate esters, respectively. The hydroboration of several aryl and alkyl epoxides is converted to a selectively Markovnikov product, branched boronate esters instead of linear ones, which, upon hydrolysis, result in secondary alcohols in high yields. Furthermore, complexes 1 and 2 catalyzed the hydroboration of aryl, alkyl, and cyclic esters, resulting in the formation of benzylic and linear boronate esters.‐. Both magnesium complexes and all boronate esters were characterized by multi‐nuclear NMR [ 1 H, 13 C{ 1 H}, 11 B{ 1 H}, and 1 H‐DOSY(for complex 2 )] spectroscopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: