Quantitative assessment reveals ecological risks from radionuclides in urban waste dumps, indicating a need for monitoring.
Uncontrolled urban waste dumps in low- and middle-income countries act as unregulated reservoirs for naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM), posing potential radiation exposure risks to both humans and non-human biota. This study provides a high-resolution radiological characterization of five major dumpsites in Gusau, Nigeria (G1–G5). Activity concentrations of ²²⁶Ra, ²³²Th, and ⁴⁰K in 60 soils, 60 plant, and 25 well water samples were determined using NaI(Tl) gamma spectrometry (relative uncertainty <10% at 95% CI). Mean soil activities were: ²²⁶Ra: 5.8–14.1 Bq/kg (global avg: 35; UNSCEAR, 2020); ²³²Th: 36.7–46.9 Bq/kg (global avg: 30); ⁴⁰K: 243–487 Bq/kg (global avg: 400). Localized extreme ⁴⁰K (1894 Bq/kg at G1S1) and ²³²Th (84.1 Bq/kg at G1S5) indicate anthropogenic hotspots, consistent with findings from similar dumpsites in sub-Saharan Africa (Akinyemi et al., 2023; Popoola et al., 2025). Soil-to-plant transfer factors (TFs) for ²²⁶Ra were unexpectedly high (mean TF = 0.86; range 0.00–3.23), exceeding unity at 28% of sampling points, indicating active biological uptake via Ca²⁺ substitution as described by Vandenhove et al. (2024) and IAEA (2022). In contrast, TFs for ²³²Th (mean = 0.32) and ⁴⁰K (mean = 0.29) were lower and biologically regulated (Isinkaye et al., 2023; Yusuf et al., 2025). All human health hazard indices (Raeq max 186 Bq/kg < 370 limit; Hₑₓ max 0.50 < 1; AEDE max 0.106 mSv/y < 1 mSv/y public limit; ELCR max 0.37×10⁻³ vs. global 0.29×10⁻³) were within safety thresholds, though G2 showed a slight ELCR elevation comparable to values reported for Indian urban dumpsites by Singh et al. (2024). The ERICA Tool Tier 1 screening flagged three sites (G2, G3, G4) with total Risk Quotient (RQ) >1 (max 1.34), necessitating Tier 2 (Brown et al., 2022; Hosseini et al., 2024). Tier 2 refined assessment showed expected RQs for all reference organisms (plants, birds, mammals, reptiles) were <0.40, with only lichen and bryophytes showing a conservative RQ up to 1.10. The overall absorbed dose rate for the most exposed organism (lichen) was 11.0 μGy/h (conservative) vs. 3.6 μGy/h (expected), both at or near the 10 μGy/h screening value recommended by ICRP (2021) and IAEA (2023). Well water showed strong attenuation (mean AEDE = 0.02 mSv/y; mean ELCR = 0.05×10⁻³), posing negligible risk (WHO, 2024). Pearson correlation (r > 0.96, p < 0.01) identified ²³²Th as the dominant external dose driver, while ²²⁶Ra dominated internal food-chain risk. We conclude that while direct external human risk is low, enhanced ²²⁶Ra plant transfer creates a chronic internal exposure pathway requiring biomonitoring. The ERICA Tool successfully identified lichens as the critical ecological receptor, consistent with recent European recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Girigisu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: