Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper focuses on the Amazon Kindle e-reader's two-way communications capabilities on the one hand and on its parent company's recent forays into data services on the other. I argue that however convenient a means Kindle may be for acquiring e-books and other types of digital content, the device nevertheless disposes reading to serve a host of inconvenient—indeed, illiberal—ends. Consequently, the technology underscores the growing importance of a new and fundamental right to counterbalance the illiberal tendencies that it embodies—a “right to read,” which would complement the existing right to free expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ted Striphas (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: