Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It is essential to measure the shear strength of soils and interface parameters between soils and geosynthetics for the safe design and stability analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures. These parameters recommended for engineering projects are normally measured by laboratory single-stage direct/interface shear and pull-out tests. The conventional single-stage tests are carried out on at least three representative specimens under three different normal stresses. However, a large quantity of specimens is required for large-scale tests, with tedious sample preparation procedures, so that large-scale single-stage testing becomes very labour intensive, time consuming and expensive. Given that the multi-stage testing method is able to measure the shear strength parameters by testing only one representative specimen, this paper investigates the feasibility, reliability and applicability of the multi-stage testing method in large-scale direct/interface shear and pull-out tests. Two compacted soils and a geogrid were tested using both single-stage and multi-stage tests. It was found that the shear strengths obtained from the multi-stage tests were slightly lower that those obtained from the single-stage tests, and the inferred apparent cohesion and friction angle matched closely. In addition, the limitations of the multi-stage testing method were highlighted. The measured direct shear strength of the soils, the interface shear strength and pull-out shear strength between the soils and the geogrid are also compared and discussed in this paper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: