No AccessJournal of Urology1 Feb 1973Prevention of Failure in Vasectomy Stanwood S. Schmidt Stanwood S. SchmidtStanwood S. Schmidt More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)60408-7AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Prevention of Failure in Vasectomy." The Journal of Urology, 109(2), pp. 296–297 © 1973 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByLABRECQUE M, NAZERALI H, MONDOR M, FORTIN V and NASUTION M (2018) Effectiveness and Complications Associated With 2 Vasectomy Occlusion TechniquesJournal of Urology, VOL. 168, NO. 6, (2495-2498), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2002.Reynolds R (2018) RE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE NO SCALPEL AND STANDARD INCISION APPROACHES TO VASECTOMY IN 5 COUNTRIESJournal of Urology, VOL. 163, NO. 6, (1892-1893), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2000.Esho J and Cass A (2018) Recanalization Rate Following Methods of Vasectomy Using Interposition of Fascial Sheath of Vas DeferensJournal of Urology, VOL. 120, NO. 2, (178-179), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1978.Alexander N, Schmidt S, Free M, Danilchik M and Hill W (2018) Sperm Antibodies After Vasectomy with FulgurationJournal of Urology, VOL. 115, NO. 1, (77-78), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1976. (2018) CommentJournal of Urology, VOL. 115, NO. 1, (78-78), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1976.Leader A, Axelrad S, Frankowski R and Mumford S (2018) Complications of 2,711 VasectomiesJournal of Urology, VOL. 111, NO. 3, (365-369), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1974. Volume 109Issue 2February 1973Page: 296-297 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1973 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Stanwood S. Schmidt More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stanwood S. Schmidt (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: