Background: Influenza is a significant public health challenge, characterized by severe disease progression and considerable societal burden. Patients at high risk of influenza-related complications require special attention in routine clinical practice. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of antiviral treatments for influenza on the incidence of bacterial complications, adverse events, and disease duration in high-risk outpatients. Design: Multicenter, non-interventional, observational cohort study. Methods: The study was conducted during the 2023–2024 influenza epidemic season and included 1867 high-risk outpatients treated with oseltamivir, umifenovir, kagocel, or imidazolyl ethanamide pentanedioic acid. Results: Bacterial complications occurred in 18.87% ( n = 335) of high-risk patients, with 17.41% ( n = 309) requiring antibacterial therapy. The hospitalization rate was 1.24% ( n = 22), and the average disease duration was 8 days. The incidence of bacterial complications varied among treatment groups: oseltamivir (18.96%, n = 102), umifenovir (12.17%%, n = 51), kagocel (22.00%%, n = 110), and imidazolyl ethanamide pentanedioic acid (22.64%%, n = 72). Adverse events were reported in 4.76% ( n = 84) of patients, most commonly gastrointestinal disorders (91.67%, n = 77), followed by allergic reactions (8.33%, n = 7). The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the oseltamivir group compared to other treatments. Conclusion: The etiotropic agents oseltamivir and umifenovir demonstrated comparable efficacy in managing influenza in high-risk patients, as reflected by their impact on bacterial complication rates and disease duration. Both drugs may be recommended for the treatment of high-risk influenza patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Токин et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: