Why the study?
Obesity increases cardiovascular disease risk, but the impact of different weight-loss diets on carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity is unclear.
Does diet-induced weight loss improve carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity?
Does diet-induced weight loss improve carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity?
Diet-induced weight loss, particularly through low-carbohydrate diets, is associated with reduced arterial stiffness as measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity.
Supports diet-induced weight loss to reduce arterial stiffness; extends meta-analytic evidence on cf-PWV.
The global epidemic of obesity has increased over the past two decades, which has been attributed to a lack of physical activity and increased energy intake. Given the fact that obesity increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases, nutritional approaches to prevent cardiovascular diseases often target weight loss. Although many strategies are used to induce weight loss, the most common ones involve either total energy restriction, carbohydrate restriction, or dietary fat restriction. This report addresses the impact of each diet on improving carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, a technique that is used to measure arterial stiffness—a surrogate marker of cardiovascular disease risk. Fourteen studies were included in the analysis and revealed that diet-induced weight-loss plateaus with increasing duration of the intervention (p = 0.174, r = 0.455). Weight loss was significantly associated with a reduction in cf-PWV (p = 0.012, r = 0.591). Further, when macronutrient composition was considered, weight loss was achieved through a low-carbohydrate diet (p = 0.097, r = 0.626), not total energy restriction (p = 0.660, r = 0.204) or low-fat diet (p = 0.142, r = 0.975), tended to reduce cf-PWV. These data suggest that weight loss achieved through a low-carbohydrate diet may have a greater impact on PWV over total energy restriction. More studies are needed to test the effect of weight loss achieved through a low-fat diet on cf-PWV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Majid Mufaqam Syed‐Abdul (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: