Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In contrast to rapid advances in computing, numerical methods and visualisation, the predictive capabilities of statistical models of turbulence are limited and improve only slowly, despite much intensive research in the recent past. The intuitive nature of turbulence modelling, its strong reliance on calibration and validation, the extreme sensitivity of model performance to seemingly minor variations in modelling details and flow conditions, and the fact that the non-local dynamics of turbulence are not well captured by single-point closure, all conspire to make turbulence modelling an especially demanding component of CFD, but one that is crucially important for the correct prediction of complex flows. This applies in particular to separation from streamlined bodies, which is, from a computational point of view, the most challenging flow feature in aeronautical CFD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. A. Leschziner (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: