Why the study?
Patients with HIV/AIDS can suffer from surgical-related diseases, making the provision of needed surgical services an urgent matter of concern.
Does the ERAS strategy improve surgical outcomes in HIV-infected patients?
Does the ERAS strategy improve surgical outcomes in HIV-infected patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review outlines the application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols across all perioperative stages for HIV-infected patients.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), which is based on evidence-based medicine, focuses on patients and aims to reduce the psychological and physiological trauma stress reactions and complications of patients, thus shortening the duration of hospitalization, promoting rapid recovery and reducing medical expenses, readmission rate and mortality rates. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) is caused by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Patients with HIV/AIDS, as with other patient populations, can suffer from several surgical-related diseases. Therefore, the need for surgery in this group of patients exists and the surgical services required by patients with AIDS has gradually become an urgent matter of concern. According to relevant literature and the authors' clinical experience, the present review summarizes the current surgical approaches for patients infected with HIV based on ERAS. In the present review, the related issues observed at different stages of surgery, including pre-operative, intra-operative, post-operative and follow-up stages, are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lü et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: