Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We examine the complex effects of faultlines and network ties on team performance. By using panel data from 672 individuals in 148 research teams at a major U.S. university, we find that informal networks serve as triggers and dampeners of faultline effects. Team performance improved when friendship ties bridged the subgroups that were cleaved by existing faultlines but deteriorated when animosity ties breached the same subgroups. Overall, the results highlight the conceptual and empirical importance of (the location of) team members’ network patterns when studying how member composition influences team outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: