Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this study was to compare three learning strategies—differentiated according to Craik & Lockhart's (1972) “depths of processing” theory—for ESL vocabulary. Six intact ESL classes at two levels of proficiency were divided into three treatment groups (keyword, semantic, and keyword-semantic). These Arabic-speaking students then received 4 days of instruction. Both recognition and cued-recall instruments were used to measure effects both 1 day and 9 days after treatment. Cued-recall results immediately after treatment revealed that the keyword method facilitated vocabulary acquisition for lower-proficiency students. The delayed results for both the recognition and cued-recall tests suggested that the combined keyword-semantic strategy increased retention above the other strategies. Possible applications of these findings are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: