Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
8579 Background: Dacarbazine (DTIC) has been approved for treating metastatic melanoma in the 1970s, and as a single agent gives a response rate of about 20%. There have been efforts to ameliorate this poor result by using DTIC in different combinations without a significant improvement. In addition, new studies with melanoma cells in vitro show that DTIC causes transcriptional up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), suggesting a potential clinical benefit from the concomitant treatment of DTIC and anti-VEGF therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a combination therapy of bevacizumab and DTIC is safe and can increase response rate and progression-free survival in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma. Methods: From June 2006 to December 2006, 8 chemo-naive pts (1 female and 7 males) with metastatic melanoma were enrolled in the study. The median age was 53 (43–74) and PS was 0–1. Patients received DTIC 800 mg/m 2 iv every 4 weeks and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg iv every 2 weeks. A treatment cycle consisted of 28 days. Results: Among 5 evaluable pts there were 1 partial response, 2 stable disease and 2 progressions, 3 pts were not evaluable because it is too early. Median number of administered cycles was 2 (2–6). The toxicity profile was particularly favourable with no G3/G4 haematological toxicity. Other most commonly seen toxicities were: nausea/vomiting (22%), mucositis (13%), diarrhea (9%). Proteinuria 1+ was reported in 3 cycles (13%). One patient with an early progression had also a G2 increase in blood pressure with a dilatative cardiomyopathy. Conclusions: The combination treatment resulted well tolerated and with a sufficient anti-tumor activity to warrant the continuing of enrolment. Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Munzone et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: