Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The author argues that North American sociologists of education have generally been motivated by a «consequentialist» morality that focuses on individual achievement measured in the aggregate rather than a teleological morality focused on communal achievement measured in the virtue of the individual. As such, the subdiscipline has generally avoided discussion of morality in schools except inasmuch as it can be used to explain stratification. The author provides data from two prominent moral education movements and suggests a reading of contemporary moral philosophy and Durkheim’s Moral Education to develop a «cultural sociology of education».
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeffrey Guhin (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: