The acceptance of the Tuskegee study findings as valid refutes the that bad ethics is always incompatible with valid science, but the still remains as to whether the data of the Tuskegee study should to be utilized. It may make sense in some situations to argue that obtained by immoral means should not be used purely on ethical grounds. even if it were wrong to cite data acquired by immoral means there is no way to purge the knowledge gained in the Tuskegee study from. Too much of what is known about the natural history of syphilis based upon the study, and that knowledge has become so deeply embedded that could not be removed....Should the results of the Tuskegee study continue be invoked in review articles and texts without some accompanying of the manner in which the findings were obtained and the ethical that the study had on the subsequent responsibilities of researchers? that the study played a crucial role in causing Americans to rethink the of human experimentation, it would seem morally incumbent upon those discuss its findings in the context of textbooks and review articles to some space for a discussion of the ethical problems associated with.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arthur L. Caplan (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: