Why the study?
Alveolar epithelial K+ channels control ionic and solvent flow for cell volume and epithelial lining fluid maintenance, but the effect of Cl- channel inhibitors on total current in pneumocytes was not established.
Do chloride channel inhibitors DCPIB and 9-AC activate K conductance via the TREK-1 channel in a type II pneumocytes model?
Do chloride channel inhibitors DCPIB and 9-AC activate K conductance via the TREK-1 channel in a type II pneumocytes model?
DCPIB and 9-AC activate the TREK-1 channel in alveolar epithelial cells, suggesting their potential as pharmacological tools for modulating this channel.
May inform TREK-1 research in alveolar epithelium; leaves open translation to human lung disease or therapy.
K + channels of the alveolar epithelium control the driving force acting on the ionic and solvent flow through the cell membrane contributing to the maintenance of cell volume and the constitution of epithelial lining fluid. In the present work, we analyze the effect of the Cl − channel inhibitors: (4‐[(2‐butyl‐6,7‐dichloro‐2‐cyclopentyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1‐oxo‐inden‐5‐yl)oxy] butanoic acid (DCPIB) and 9‐anthracenecarboxylic acid (9‐AC) on the total current in a type II pneumocytes (A549 cell line) model by patch clamp, immunocytochemical, and gene knockdown techniques. We noted that DCPIB and 9‐AC promote the activation of K conductance. In fact, they significantly increase the intensity of the current and shift its reversal potential to values more negative than the control. By silencing outward rectifier channel in its anoctamin 6 portion, we excluded a direct involvement of Cl − ions in modulation of I K and, by means of functional tests with its specific inhibitor spadin, we identified the TREK‐1 channel as the presumable target of both drugs. As the activity of TREK‐1 has a key role for the correct functioning of the alveolar epithelium, the identification of DCPIB and 9‐AC molecules as its activators suggests their possible use to build new pharmacological tools for the modulation of this channel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Canella et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: