Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article presents a general critique of win-win arguments that pair gender equality and economic growth. Reviewing the “growth is good for women” and “gender equality is good for growth” arguments, the article argues that the win-win conclusions are contingent on particular notions of gender equality, measurement of output, work, well-being and policy. More importantly, these arguments also constrain the quest for substantive gender equality (“equality of outcomes”), since they rely on micro-level fixes to improve gender-equal access without challenging the neoliberal macroeconomic framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valeria Esquivel (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: