PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1996The Journal of Higher Education362 citationsOpen Access

Research, Teaching, and Service: Why Shouldn't Women's Work Count?

View Full Paper
SPShelley M. ParkUniversity of Central Florida

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article examines one way institutionalized sexism operates in the university setting by examining the gender roles and gender hierarchies implicit in (allegedly gender-neutral) university tenure and promotion policies. Current working assumptions regarding (1) what constitutes good research, teaching, and service and (2) the relative importance of each of these endeavors reflect and perpetuate masculine values and practices, thus preventing the professional advancement of female faculty both individually and collectively. A gendered division of labor exists within (as outside) the contemporary academy wherein research is implicitly deemed "men's work" and is explicitly valued, whereas teaching and service are characterized as "women's work" and explicitly devalued.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shelley M. Park (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e9a634b74d37a71af1257https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1996.11780249
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper