Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 1, 2014Journal of Refractive SurgeryOpen Access

Comparison of Two Multifocal Intraocular Lens Designs That Differ Only in Near Add

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

EPEmilio PedrottiUniversity of VeronaRMRodolfo MastropasquaUniversity of Chieti-PescaraMPMattia Passilongo

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Pedrotti et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e9c63eed4f0c78fa41241https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20141021-07
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Visual outcome comparison of unilateral versus bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction2009 · 57 citations
  2. 2Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation2000 · 277 citations
  3. 3History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens2006 · 308 citations
  4. 4Comparative study of Acrysof ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lenses +4.00 D and +3.00 D: visual performance and wavefront error2012 · 19 citations
  5. 5Visual outcomes and optical performance with a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation single-optic accommodating intraocular lens2010 · 47 citations