Key result
Prior COVID-19 infection was associated with late gadolinium enhancement in 9% of collegiate athletes, indicating modest myocardial inflammation or fibrosis that would be missed by standard screening.
Why the study?
Myocarditis is a leading cause of sudden cardiac death in competitive athletes, but the prevalence of myocardial inflammation and fibrosis in young athletes after COVID-19 infection was unknown.
Does screening cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) detect myocardial inflammation or fibrosis in collegiate athletes recently recovered from COVID-19?
Cohort (n=66)
No
Does screening cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) detect myocardial inflammation or fibrosis in collegiate athletes recently recovered from COVID-19?
Absolute Event Rate: 9% vs 0%
CMR screening detected a modest 9% prevalence of myocardial inflammation or fibrosis in collegiate athletes after mild or asymptomatic COVID-19, which would have been missed by standard ECG, troponin, and echocardiography.
CMR may detect subclinical changes missed by standard screening; leaves open whether routine use is warranted in collegiate athletes.
Background Myocarditis is a leading cause of sudden cardiac death among competitive athletes and may occur without antecedent symptoms. COVID-19-associated myocarditis has been well-described, but the prevalence of myocardial inflammation and fibrosis in young athletes after COVID-19 infection is unknown. Objectives This study sought to evaluate the prevalence and extent of cardiovascular involvement in collegiate athletes that had recently recovered from COVID-19. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of collegiate varsity athletes with prior COVID-19 infection, all of whom underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) prior to resumption of competitive sports in August 2020. Results Twenty-two collegiate athletes with prior COVID-19 infection underwent CMR. The median time from SARS-CoV-2 infection to CMR was 52 days. The mean age was 20.2 years. Athletes represented 8 different varsity sports. This cohort was compared to 22 healthy controls and 22 tactical athlete controls. Most athletes experienced mild illness (N=17, 77%), while the remainder (23%) were asymptomatic. No athletes had abnormal troponin I, electrocardiograms, or LVEF < 50% on echocardiography. Late gadolinium enhancement was found in 9% of collegiate athletes and one athlete (5%) met formal criteria for myocarditis. Conclusions Our study suggests that the prevalence of myocardial inflammation or fibrosis after an asymptomatic or mild course of ambulatory COVID-19 among competitive athletes is modest (9%), but would be missed by ECG, Ti, and strain echocardiography. Future investigation is necessary to further phenotype cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 in order to better counsel athletes on return to sports participation. Condensed Abstract COVID-19-associated myocarditis has been well-described, but the prevalence of myocardial inflammation and fibrosis in athletes after COVID-19 is unknown. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 22 collegiate athletes with prior COVID-19 infection who underwent electrocardiography, troponin I, echocardiography with strain, and CMR. The median time from SARS-CoV-2 infection to CMR was 52 days. All athletes experienced mild illness or were asymptomatic. Late gadolinium enhancement was found in 9%. This suggests the prevalence of myocardial inflammation or fibrosis after an asymptomatic or mild course of COVID-19 among competitive athletes is modest, but would be missed without CMR screening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in COVID-19 (n=66). Prior COVID-19 infection vs. Healthy controls and tactical athlete controls was evaluated on Presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance. Prior COVID-19 infection was associated with late gadolinium enhancement in 9% of collegiate athletes, indicating modest myocardial inflammation or fibrosis that would be missed by standard screening.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: