Key result
Newer BRS with thinner struts demonstrate favorable efficacy and safety in simple CAD.
Why the study?
Persistent adverse events with current DES have renewed interest in leave-nothing-behind strategies such as bioresorbable scaffolds to avoid permanently caging coronary vessels.
Do bioresorbable scaffolds provide favorable clinical efficacy and safety in patients with simple coronary artery disease?
Do bioresorbable scaffolds provide favorable clinical efficacy and safety in patients with simple coronary artery disease?
Newer generation bioresorbable scaffolds show promise for treating simple coronary artery disease with improved biocompatibility and safety profiles.
Supports evaluation in simple lesions; leaves open whether randomized trials confirm benefit over contemporary stents.
INTRODUCTION: Device-related persistent adverse events with current DES-use have refocused the attention on a 'leave-nothing-behind' philosophy, in which it is hypothesized that treating coronary stenosis without permanently caging the vessel with a metallic implant would lead to superior clinical outcomes. One of these uncaging technologies is bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS). AREAS COVERED: In this article, we describe the technical specifications and clinical data of currently available BRS devices. EXPERT OPINION: Newer BRS devices have thinner struts and more biocompatible scaffold backbones (either polymer-based or metal-based), resulting in improved radial strength, faster resorption times, and more antithrombogenic properties (e.g. magnesium-based scaffolds). Results of BRS in the treatment of simple coronary artery disease demonstrate favorable clinical efficacy and safety outcome data. It is probable that over the next 5 years more fourth-generation devices with ever-increasing biocompatibility and safety profiles will be investigated and released commercially, resulting in a much more prominent role for BRS, especially in the treatment of simple coronary artery disease in younger patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vanoverbeke et al. (2025) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) was evaluated. Newer bioresorbable scaffolds with thinner struts and more biocompatible backbones demonstrate favorable clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of simple coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: