Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effect of continuous-wave (CW) and pulsed-wave (PW) radiofrequency radiation (RFR) in the microwave range on UV-induced DNA repair has been investigated in MRC-5 normal human diploid fibroblasts. RFR exposure at power densities of 1 (or 5) and 10 mW/cm2 gave a maximum specific absorption rate (SAR) (at 10 mW/cm2) of 0.39 +/- 0.15 W/kg for 350 MHz RFR, 4.5 +/- 3.0 W/kg for 850 MHz RFR, and 2.7 +/- 1.6 W/kg for 1.2 GHz RFR. RFR exposures for 1 to 3 h at 37 degrees C, in either continuous-wave or pulsed-wave modes, had no effect on the rate of repair replication label incorporated into preexisting UV-damaged DNA. RFR exposures (PW), with a constant medium temperature of 39 degrees C at 350 and 850 MHz during the repair period after UV damage, also had no effect. Assay for induction of repair synthesis by RFR exposure alone in non-UV irradiated cells was negative for the 350-, 850-, and 1200-MHz CW and PW RFR at 37 degrees C and the 350- and 850-MHz PW RFR at 39 degrees C. RFR does not induce DNA repair under these exposure conditions. In preliminary experiments--with the tissue culture medium maintained at 39 degrees C and RFR exposures (PW) at the frequencies of 350, 850, and 1200 MHz--no effect on incorporation of [3H]thymidine into DNA undergoing semiconservative synthesis was observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meltz et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: