Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To determine whether attitudes toward a stigmatized group are primarily instrumental or symbolic, multiple aspects of AIDS stigma were assessed in a 2-wave telephone survey with a national probability sample of adults (N = 382). Using responses to the Attitude Functions Inventory, respondents were categorized according to the dominant psychological function served by their attitudes: (a) evaluative (based on instrumental concerns about personal risk for infection), or (b) expressive (based on a need to affirm one's self-concept by expressing personal values). Negative affect toward a person who contracted AIDS through homosexual behavior, support for mandatory testing of so-called high-risk groups, and support for other punitive AIDS policies were predicted mainly by attitudes toward gay men for heterosexuals with expressive attitudes but not for those with evaluative attitudes, a pattern labeled functional divergence. Behavioral intentions to avoid persons with AIDS in various hypothetical situations were predicted primarily by beliefs about contagion for heterosexuals with expressive and evaluative attitudes alike, a pattern labeled functional consensus. Implications for AIDS education and for research based on the functional approach to attitudes are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herek et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: