Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an activating guideline-based care (GBC) by occupational physicians (OPs). METHODS: An economic evaluation was conducted in a randomized controlled trial with police workers on sick leave due to mental health problems (n = 240). In the intervention group trained OPs provided GBC, compared with usual care with easy access to a psychologist. Sick leave data and health care costs were gathered after 1-year follow-up. Analyses comprised bootstrap techniques, cost-effectiveness planes, and acceptability curves. RESULTS: Health care utilization costs (euro574.532 in total) were significantly lower in the intervention group (mean difference -euro520; 95% CI -euro980 to euro59), whereas there were no significant differences in days of sick leave and productivity loss costs. CONCLUSIONS: GBC could be cost-effective, as lower direct costs lead to equal treatment outcomes of workers with common mental disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rebergen et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: