Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates resistance to T-cell engagers in AML, highlighting the need for new strategies.
Bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTE ® molecules) have transformed the treatment of B-cell malignancies, yet clinical activity in AML has been modest. Resistance is driven in part by the genetic heterogeneity of AML, most notably TP53 mutations, present in 10–15% of de novo and up to 25% of therapy-related AML. Thus, we hypothesized that TP53 aberrations in AML contribute to cell-intrinsic and extrinsic resistance against T-cell-based immunotherapy. Cytotoxicity against TP53 -deleted (DEL) primary AML cells and TP53 -knockdown (KD) AML cell lines was reduced in co-cultures with T cells stimulated with the BiTE molecule AMG 330 (CD3×CD33). In addition, T-cell proliferation and proinflammatory cytokine secretion was impaired in co-cultures with TP53 KD cells. Transwell assays identified the secretome of TP53 KD AML cells as a key contributor to the immunosuppressive effects. Proteomic analysis revealed TGF-β1 in TP53 KD co-cultures as a mediator of T-cell suppression. RNA sequencing of T cells co-cultured with TP53 KD cells uncovered a transcriptional shift toward a senescent cell cycle profile. Our data collectively identify the immunosuppressive secretome of TP53 -deficient AML as a key barrier to T-cell-engaging immunotherapies, underscoring an unmet clinical need for strategies able to restore T-cell function in TP53 KD AML.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winter et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: