Interrupted time-series study reveals shifting psychiatric disorder incidence in South Korea during COVID-19, highlighting sharp increases in anxiety and youth-onset mental disorders.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the incidence of various psychiatric disorders during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic using hospital visit data for the entire population of a nation. We used Korea's universal compulsory health insurance data to conduct a descriptive analysis to evaluate changes in psychiatric disorder incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Hospital visit data related to psychiatric disorders were retrieved from the National Health Insurance Database. First-ever diagnosis for specific psychiatric disorders for each Korean was identified (from January 2015 to February 2023) and monthly age-standardized incidence rates were calculated. An interrupted time-series analysis was used to estimate counterfactual disease incidence rates and observed and counterfactual rates were compared using difference-in-difference framework. RESULTS: Compared to pre-pandemic period, there was a decrease in the incidence [percentage changes in monthly rate (95% confidence intervals)] of organic mental disorders [-14.6% (-18.4, -10.9)] and psychoactive substance related disorders [-12.9% (-17.5, -8.3)] during the pandemic. However, anxiety disorders [8.8% (3.1, 14.6)], behavioral syndromes associated with physiological disturbances [8.1% (4.2, 11.9)], mental retardation [8.6% (3.0, 14.2)], psychological developmental disorders [19.6% (11.5, 27.7)], childhood- and adolescent-onset behavioral and emotional disorders [45.1% (28.4, 61.8)], and unspecified mental diseases [51.8% (39.8, 63.8)] increased. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological disease incidence patterns changed substantially during the pandemic in South Korea. Various pandemic-related stressors, such as disrupted lifestyles and hospital accessibility, may have influenced these changes. The causes and public health consequences of these changes require further evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: