Experimental evaluation demonstrates comparable velocity estimation and tracking performance across most algorithms on a six-axis manipulator, highlighting sliding-mode observer resilience to faults.
Accurate velocity information is often essential to the control of robot manipulators, especially for precise tracking of fast trajectories. However, joint velocities are rarely directly measured and instead estimated to save costs. While many approaches have been proposed for the velocity estimation of robot joints, no comprehensive experimental evaluation exists, making it difficult to choose the appropriate method. This paper compares multiple estimation methods running on a six degrees-of-freedom manipulator. We evaluate: 1) the estimation error using a ground-truth signal, 2) the closed-loop tracking error, 3) convergence behavior, 4) sensor fault tolerance, 5) implementation and tuning effort. To ensure a fair comparison, we optimally tune the estimators using a genetic algorithm. All estimation methods have a similar estimation error and similar closed-loop tracking performance, except for the nonlinear high-gain observer, which is not accurate enough. Sliding-mode observers can provide a precise velocity estimation despite sensor faults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: