Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental condition with challenges in timely and accurate diagnosis. This study evaluates the effectiveness of combining electroencephalogram (EEG) data with machine learning techniques to enhance ADHD diagnostic accuracy. Methods: A total of 168 participants, comprising 107 ADHD and 61 neurotypical (NT) individuals, were assessed using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Present and Lifetime Version Korean Version (K-SADS-PL-K). EEG data from 19 channels were analyzed across five frequency bands: delta (1-4 hz), theta (4-8 hz), alpha (8-12 hz), beta (12-30 hz), and gamma (30-51 hz). The Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier was employed for classification, and Leave-One-Subject-Out (LOSO) cross-validation was used to ensure model robustness. Results: Data augmentation through 30-second segmentations generated 2434 EEG segments for ADHD and 1060 for NT. The XGBoost model achieved a test accuracy of 90.81% and an F1-score of 0.9347. Feature importance analysis using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values identified middle beta frequency features, particularly from the O1 electrode site, as significant contributors to classification. Conclusion: EEG-based machine learning models, such as the XGBoost classifier, show potential as non-invasive tools for ADHD diagnosis, offering high accuracy and interpretability. The novelty of this approach lies in combining SHAP analysis with data augmentation techniques and LOSO cross-validation, ensuring both explainability and robust generalizability. Future research with larger datasets and diverse populations is recommended to validate findings and explore clinical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: