The main aim of this study was to assess the effects of adding MT to a Respiratory Rehabilitation (RR) program in patients with Respiratory Disorders (RD). A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro and Google Scholar (February 1 st 2023). The outcome measures were pulmonary function parameters (FEV 1 and FVC); and exercise capacity, through the 6-minute walk test (6-MWT). Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and were pooled in a meta-analysis with a random effects model. In total, 6 studies were included. Regarding the pulmonary function parameters, no significant effects were found in favor of adding MT to a RR program. However, the meta-analysis showed a significant improvement of 6-MWT when MT were added to a RR with a small clinical effect (n = 6, SMD = –0.55 (–1.01 to –0.09)). Lastly, the meta-regression analysis revealed that the intervention time of MT was not significantly correlated with the improvement of FEV1 (R2 = 52.49%, P = . 16), FVC (R2=4.22%, P = . 70), or 6-MWT (R 2 =9.95%, P = . 62). There is low-quality evidence that adding MT to an RR program can improve the exercise capacity in patients with RD. However, MT plus RR showed no effect on pulmonary function parameters, also with low-quality evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cuenca‐Martínez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: