Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Critical infrastructures are increasingly Internet-connected cyber–physical systems whose recovery after cyber incidents must satisfy safety, timing, regulatory, and interdependency constraints. Yet, the use of large language models (LLMs) for generating recovery plans remains fragmented across cybersecurity, industrial control, digital twins, and AI assurance research. This review synthesizes that emerging field through a structured critical survey of studies on LLMs in incident response, OT/ICS resilience, and cyber–physical recovery, with a focused perspective on grounding, trust, and assurance mechanisms relevant to recovery-plan generation. It develops an architecture-centric taxonomy spanning prompt-only assistants, retrieval-augmented copilots, graph-aware planners, multi-agent systems, and hybrid verification/simulation pipelines; maps realistic applications across energy, water, manufacturing, transportation, healthcare, and telecommunications; and organizes limitations into technical, security, governance, and human-factor categories. Based on this synthesis, the paper proposes the Grounded Recovery Planning Stack as a reference architecture and outlines a staged roadmap from human-in-the-loop copilots to bounded orchestration. The main conclusion is that near-term value lies in grounded, auditable, compliance-aware copilots, whereas autonomous recovery execution remains premature without stronger validation, state-aware grounding, sector-specific benchmarks, and formal safeguards.
Tsochev et al. (Mon,) studied this question.