Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Helicopter transport of pediatric trauma patients in an urban Emergency Medical Services system remains controversial. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients transported by helicopter to a pediatric trauma center in Los Angeles, California, was conducted over a 3-year period. Pediatric patients (age < 15 years) are transported by helicopter if ground transport to a pediatric trauma center would exceed 20 minutes. Emergency Medical Services reports and hospital records were reviewed for key prehospital and outcome indicators. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-nine patients met the study inclusion criteria. The median age was 5 years (range, 0-14 years). The most common mechanisms of injury were falls and automobile versus pedestrian crashes. Eighty-two percent of patients had a Revised Trauma Score > 7. Of the 175 (93%) patients whose hospital records were available, 24 (14%) were intubated in the emergency department, 32 (18%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 7 (4%) were taken directly to the operating room. Injury Severity Scores (ISSs) were as follows: ISS 0 to 15, 146 (83%); ISS 16 to 30, 26 (15%); and ISS > 30, 3 (2%). Fifty-seven (33%) patients were discharged home from the emergency department. CONCLUSION: The majority of pediatric trauma patients transported by helicopter in our study sustained minor injuries. A revised policy to better identify pediatric patients who might benefit from helicopter transport appears to be warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eckstein et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: